Modern History

Home > Modern History > International Studies in Peace and Conflict > The Cold War 1945-1991 > Peaceful coexistence

The Cold War 1945–1991

Peaceful Co-existence

Paul Brown
Camden High School

Outcomes

Students:

H1.1 describe the role of key features, issues, individuals, groups and events of selected twentieth-century studies
H1.2 analyse and evaluate the role of key features, issues, individuals, groups and events of selected twentieth-century studies
Extract from Modern History Stage 6 Syllabus Board of Studies NSW 2004.

Key features and issues

From this tutorial you will learn about the development of the Cold War to 1968.

The emergence of peaceful co-existence

There were a series of problems facing the Soviet Union in 1952-53.

Malenkhov, one of Stalin’s successors, believed a form of accommodation with the West had to be found. “At the present time,” he said, “there is no dispute or unresolved question that cannot be settled peacefully by mutual agreement of the interested countries.” Successful examples to illustrate this belief included:

In 1955 Nikita Kruschchev emerged as leader of the Soviet Union. His views included:

In respect to Stalin, Kruschchev:

When Kruschchev made the alarmingly provocative statement, “We will bury you”, to the UN it was not meant to be taken literally.

To make sure that the Soviet Union was not disadvantaged Kruschchev:

Further Crises over Berlin

Even after the Berlin Airlift of 1948-49 there continued to be a crisis over Berlin. There had not been a formal peace treaty that ended World War II and settled the frontiers of Eastern Europe. In 1958 Khrushchev proposed that the US, Britain, France and the Soviet Union all sign, with the two Germanys, a peace treaty recognising the de facto frontiers (the frontiers as they currently were). He proposed making Berlin a free city that would be de-militarised and self-governing. Its integrity and access to the rest of the world would be guaranteed by all the signatories.

This was not acceptable to the Western powers because:

Krushchev was blunt about the offer and gave the West six months to decide or otherwise he would allow East German control of the access to Berlin. This had the potential to become a nuclear crisis. This crisis passed when Khrushchev dropped his deadline and Eisenhower offered to negotiate and invited Khrushchev to the US. Little was decided at this meeting but the parties did agree to meet again in 1960 in Paris.

Proposed Paris Summit, 1960

Before the Summit got underway, a U2 American spy plane that was capable of flying up to 70,000 ft (21538 m) was shot down over Soviet Territory. It had been on a mission to photograph potential missile bases in the Urals. At first the Americans denied that it was spy flight but eventually Eisenhower was forced to admit it. There was much posturing over this and the Summit never took place.

After this:

Results of the policy of peaceful co-existence

There was little impact from this policy on US-Soviet relations because the United States didn’t trust the Soviets (See John Foster Dulles attitude, Secretary of States under Eisenhower, he called Soviet peace initiatives ‘Trojan Doves’.) Other crises arose such as continuing problems over Berlin and the failure to hold the proposed Paris Peace Summit in 1960. All of this led to increasing tensions and further crises - in the Bay of Pigs, Cuba, April 1961, in the erection of the Berlin Wall in August 1961 and finally; in the Cuban missile crisis in August-October, 1962. Peaceful co-existence as a policy had failed.

Bibliography



Neals logo | Copyright | Disclaimer | Contact Us | Help